The
protagonist of White Jacket (1850) is
an unnamed American sailor who seeks passage home from the South Seas on an
American man-of-war. He is given the name 'White Jacket' by his shipmates
because of the white jacket he wears, and which he made himself. The narrator's
relationship with this garment is vexed. He made it himself in order to keep
him warm around the Cape, and it has capacious pockets so that he can keep his
belongings always at hand. However, the jacket is not waterproof and absorbs
the water like a sponge, and once nearly costs the narrator his life. As the
ship nears home latitudes, the narrator is able at last to jettison the jacket
overboard. The other crew members, mistaking it for a white shark, hurl harpoons
at it, and it slowly descends through the water.
We
know that Ishmael, the narrator of Melville's next book, Moby Dick has an uneasy relationship with the colour white, and we
may suspect that this feeling was shared by his creator after reading White Jacket. In Mardi also, the colour white is associated with horror and curses.
Realism and the
Sea Novel
Redburn, White Jacket and Moby Dick may be seen as three linked attempts to deal with the
problem of realism in a sea novel. In order for a sea novel to be realistic, a
great part of the text must necessarily involve explication of the specific
features of shipboard life. The landlubber reader must understand the total
context in which the narrative is taking place in order for the true realistic (symbolic,
dramatic) import of the narrative to be understood. This then involves the
inclusion of large stretches of text where nothing happens, but where things
are simply described or explained. Melville experimented with various solutions
to this problem in all his sea novels.
In Redburn, the expository passages are
kept to the absolute minimum required only for the illumination of the themes
of education and the passage from innocence to experience. The book is weighted
towards narrative. The named protagonist is a literary character who undergoes
change and whose internal life is presented to the reader. White Jacket swings the other way. There is no single overarching
narrative as there is in Redburn. White Jacket is constructed of separate
narrative incidents strung together; the expository passages occupy a greater
place in the text. The unnamed narrator, who often refers to himself as 'White
Jacket' and 'he', is less a character in a novel and more a window onto the
world of a state-of-the-art warship. This protagonist documents and records the
abuses, injustices and random cruelties of his environment, but never tells us
what changes they have wrought on him. If Redburn
is a feature film, White Jacket is a
documentary. In Moby Dick, Melville
got the balance between narrative and documentation just right.
Narrative
highlights
However,
this is not to say that nothing happens, or that the book is boring. It
contains a wealth of anecdote, marvellous yarns, fabulous prose, as one would
expect from Melville, finely etched characters, unforgettable images and wholly
engrossing scenes. Three stand out.
First,
is the account of an operation carried out on an unfortunate sailor who has
been shot in the leg. The leg must come off, and the operation is carried out
in full ceremony on the half deck. The
ship is in port, and surgeons from all the other ships in the fleet have been
invited to attend and observe the renowned Dr Cuticle perform the operation.
The chapters in which this operation is described are some of the funniest and
horrific in Melville's work. Once the
audience are assembled, all dressed in their finest in honour of the occasion,
Dr Cuticle makes a long speech lauding the army and the navy as the best place
for young surgeons to practice their profession. He then removes his jacket,
his wig, his false teeth and his glass eye before calling on the patient to be
brought in, transforming himself into a living skull. This death's head then
advises the patient, who is speechless in terror and pain, to repose every limb: "The precision of an
operation is often impaired by the inconsiderate restlessness of the
patient." Commenting on his work and asking for volunteers to handle
the saw and so on, the operation proceeds. The patient is entirely invisible
throughout: focus is placed on the audience, the surgeon, the assistants. At
the end, Dr Cuticle invites the audience to wash their hands in water if they
feel inclined, as for himself, he will just wipe his on his handkerchief. As
the participants leave the half deck, word is brought that the patient has
died. The whole scene is gruesomely funny, and reminded this reader of the
terrible scenes involving the infamous Dr Benway in the work of William
Burroughs.
Second,
is the mutiny that almost takes place involving the matter of beards. All the
mariners have grown splendid facial hair on the voyage, and the progress and
style of the beards is a matter for immense pride and curiosity among the crew.
The text displays great pleasure in describing and naming all the various types
of beard. As the ship nears home, the captain passes word that all beards are
to be trimmed in accordance with navy regulations. This almost starts a mutiny,
and Melville has great fun satirising the double standards involved between
following two different texts: the Articles of War which govern navy life, and
Leviticus, one of the books which forms the basis of Christian hypocrisy the
war ship is designed to uphold: According
to a then recent ordinance at Washington, the beards of
both officers and
seamen were to be accurately laid out and
surveyed, and on no account must come
lower than the mouth, so as
to correspond with the Army standard--a regulation
directly
opposed to the theocratical law laid down in the nineteenth
chapter
and twenty-seventh verse of Leviticus, where it is
expressly ordained, "Thou
shalt not mar the corners of thy
beard." But legislators do not always
square their statutes by
those of the Bible. (85)
The third incident is when White Jacket falls from the
weather-top-gallant-yard-arm into the sea. His whole life passes before his
eyes as he flounders in the sea, dragged down by his water impregnated jacket, as
the huge black hull of the ship glides slowly past him, like a black world in the water. (92)
The Uses of Allegory
The subtitle to the novel is The World on a Man-of-War, and the image of the ship as a microcosm
of the world (ship of state, ship of fools) is developed as an allegory
throughout the novel. Great attention is given to the details of the social
organisation of the ship, of the divisions between crew, petty officers,
officers, captain and commodore. Such are
the principal divisions into which a man-of-war's crew
is divided; but the
inferior allotments of duties are endless,
and would require a German
commentator to chronicle. (3) Like the real world, all the various branches
of government and society are present: education, health, trades and
professions (carpenters, barbers, cooks, purser, surgeons), overseers, and of
course a police force, both open and secret, with a network of spies and informers.
The ship is huge, with a population of at least 500, and each member has their
role to play, their allotted function in the smooth functioning of the ship. Each
part of the ship and its special uses is described in detail; great attention is given also to the ad hoc
social divisions among the men, the mess kits, their sleeping, cooking and
eating arrangements, and the internal economy of the ship is also foregrounded.
The realism of this documentation is contrasted, however, with the highly allegorical
and symbolic names given to the characters: Captain Claret; Mad Jack, the First
Lieutenant; Surgeon Bandage; and the two gunners mates, Priming and Cylinder.
The name of the ship itself is highly ironical and allegorical: the Neversink.
Melville uses the allegory to launch a bitter attack
on the random cruelties of naval life, particularly of the daily floggings for
all kinds of petty infringements. You see
a human being, stripped like a slave; scourged worse than
a hound. And for
what? For things not essentially criminal, but
only made so by arbitrary laws.
(33) White Jacket rages against the injustice and blatant hypocrisy of a system
that allows one man to exercise tyranny over all those under him. Not least is
he enraged by the fact that captain and men come from a democracy, whose
express purpose and origin was a reaction to this kind of unrestrained
autocracy; and that once the ship is at sea, all the democratic, human rights
of the crew are totally suspended, and unbounded despotism is established: In the American navy there is an everlasting
suspension of the Habeas Corpus. (35)
White
Jacket is the angriest of Melville's books in this regard.
It constantly emphasizes the gap between the crew - the people, as White Jacket calls them- and the officers, who are
all described as incompetent rogues. In a competition between the officers of
the various ships of the fleet as to which vessel can set all canvass the
fastest, a topman falls to the deck and is killed, as a result of the officer's
urging him on to greater speed and less caution. And thus
do 'the people' of the gun-deck
suffer, that the Commodore on the poop may be
glorified. (46) White Jacket ironically passes comment. The anger here is
undoubtedly personal, but it also places the book firmly in the stream of the
mid-Victorian novel of social criticism by writers such as Dickens, Gaskell,
Hugo and Harriet Beecher Stowe. What gives the book its especial power and beauty is that the realism of its
documentary method unites with the allegory and satire, resulting in a double
image: the text represents both a real ship in a real world and at the same
time a symbolic ship in an allegorical world.
As
a man of war that sails through the sea, so this earth that sails through the
air. The port we sail from is forever astern. And though far out of sight of
land, for ages and ages we continue to sail with sealed orders, and our last
destination remains a secret to ourselves and our officers; yet our final haven
was predestined ere we slipped from the stocks at Creation. (93)
So
long as a man-of-war exists,
it must ever remain a picture of much that is
tyrannical and
repelling in human nature. (49)
No comments:
Post a Comment